I’m sure if you’ve
done any reading about good writing, you’ve come across advice that suggests
that you should be careful with descriptive words. It is a common criticism of
novice writers’ work that the prose is over-littered with adjectives. However,
the problem lies more, in my opinion, in the liberal use of adverbs. What’s the
difference?
At the most
basic level, an adjective describes a noun or pronoun whilst an adverb
describes or modifies everything else. Although this is a crude and elementary
definition, and of course, it can get a little more complicated than this, this
simple distinction is enough to help most people determine which is which.
Often the biggest
problems lie with adverbs that end in –ly
(i.e., quickly), rather than simple adjectives
like red.
For example, you
will often see sentences written something like: He
quickly grabbed his briefcase and ran out the door. Or: Excitedly, she ripped open the envelope.
I’ve done this
myself, particularly on first drafts, and I think it is born of a need to try
to make clear to the reader how something
was done. As writers, we want the reader to understand completely how we see
the scene unfolding. But there are two things to consider. First, the reader is
often more capable of understanding this from the context, and, second, there
is often a much better, more interesting, way to get the information across.
Let’s take
another look at the first of the examples above: He quickly grabbed his briefcase and ran out the door. Here, quickly
is the villain. Quickly is an adverb,
and in this case, totally unnecessary. The word grabbed already implies a quick action, so quickly adds nothing to the action. In fact, this is often
true of many of the adverbs that are over-used.
The same is true
of the second example. Ripped, in
this context, implies that the action is performed with either great excitement
or, possibly, anger. You might think that excitedly
informs the reader of which, but, if you consider the rest of the prose, it is likely
that clues to which are already present.
Readers are often
intelligent enough to ‘get it’ from the rest of the text. For example, if the
protagonist of this sentence had already been known to be waiting for the
results of a recent interview, then ripped
implies that she opens the envelope in a state of high excitement. On the other
hand, if she was dreading the results, another verb would tell us this, such as
hesitated (She hesitated as she opened
the envelope). Finally, the context
might have made the action so clear that you may not need any verb other than a
simple opened.
If you find that
your writing is criticised for having too many adjectives or adverbs, or if you
simply want to avoid this criticism, take a look back at your prose. You might
find that you can either remove the offending element, or reconsider the active
verb, and you should find that your writing is a lot clearer and much improved.
Of course, you
can also have too many adjectives: the
big bad brown angry bear. Again, a little judicious pruning might improve
your prose. Of course, you may also be guilty of lazy word choices. For
example, a huge stone, could be
written as: a boulder. And, it would
be wise to be careful with all of your descriptive terms.
But, in my
experience, adverbs are the greatest villains so mind your adverbs!